Human–wildlife conflict is increasing across Africa and enlisting the support of local people is critical to conflict mitigation and conservation efforts. Information from attitude surveys can inform management and policy decisions particularly in situations of human–wildlife conflict. Our review of survey research in Africa revealed a wide range of methods. We discuss the challenges in obtaining valid, reliable, and generalizable data and consider the feasibility of transferring Western-based methods and theory to African settings. We examine how the reviewed studies address methodological issues as they relate to the basic tenets of scientific inquiry and make recommendations for a framework of standards of best practice. Using social science research tools, it is important to build upon this growing body of human dimensions research in Africa. Researchers need to recognize cultural variation while implementing consistent methodological and theoretical frameworks to ensure valid and reliable information is informing decision-making processes. Keywords: Africaattitudesconservationmethodssurveyswildlife The authors thank the editor and two anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions that have served to improve the article. Notes 1. Although it is beyond the scope of this article to include survey research from other developing regions of the world, we believe the issues raised here are applicable in the global context. Lewis, D. M. (undated). Survey of perceptions towards wildlife for two village communities with different exposure to a wildlife conservation project. Lupande Development Project, Nyamalum, Zambia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Browne‐Nuñez et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: