The catalytic reduction of CO₂/CO is key to reducing the carbon footprint and producing the chemical building blocks needed for society. In this work, we performed a theoretical investigation of the differences and similarities of the CO₂/CO catalytic reduction reactions in gas, aqueous solution, and aprotic solution. We demonstrate that the binding energy serves as a good descriptor for the gaseous and aqueous phases and allows catalysts to be categorized by reduction products. The CO* vs O* and CO* vs H* binding energies for these phases give a convenient mapping of catalysts regarding their main product for the CO₂/CO reduction reactions. However, for the aprotic phase, descriptors alone are insufficient for the mapping. We show that a microkinetic model (including the CO* and H* binding energies) allows spanning and interpreting the reaction space for the aprotic phase.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagger et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: