Why the study?
Infusion site pain deters subcutaneous treprostinil use in pediatric pulmonary arterial hypertension, and site maintenance and pain control strategies vary widely between treatment centers.
What are the current practices and formalized strategies for subcutaneous treprostinil site maintenance and pain control in pediatric pulmonary hypertension?
What are the current practices and formalized strategies for subcutaneous treprostinil site maintenance and pain control in pediatric pulmonary hypertension?
Formalized strategies for subcutaneous treprostinil site maintenance and pain management were developed based on a survey of 13 pediatric pulmonary hypertension centers to standardize practice.
May inform pediatric PH treprostinil site care; hypothesis-generating pending prospective validation.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension is a chronic, progressive, and life-threatening disease in children with diverse causes of pulmonary arterial hypertension. The most severe cases of pulmonary arterial hypertension require aggressive treatments with systemic administration of continuous prostacyclin therapy, including treprostinil and epoprostenol. The successful use of continuous subcutaneous treprostinil therapy eliminates the need for an indwelling central venous catheter and its associated risks. However, pain at the subcutaneous infusion site, an expected side effect of this therapy, is often a deterrent to its widespread use. Effective subcutaneous treprostinil site maintenance and pain management is essential to achieve success with this therapy, but strategies surrounding site maintenance and pain control vary significantly between pediatric pulmonary hypertension treatment centers. In an attempt to standardize practice, a survey on the use of subcutaneous treprostinil and site maintenance and pain management strategies, as well as its perceived effectiveness, was disseminated to 13 pediatric pulmonary hypertension centers of the Pediatric Pulmonary Hypertension Network. Responses to the survey were collected and analyzed and were developed into a set of formalized strategies to facilitate knowledge sharing and standardization of practice.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jackson et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched one closely related paper. Consider it for comparative context: