The separation length employed to scale unsteady phenomena in strong (separated) nominally two-dimensional (2-D) shock/turbulent-boundary-layer interactions cannot be directly extended to three-dimensional (3-D) swept interactions, due to the quasi-conical symmetry of 3-D interactions. This paper examines the issue by considering large-eddy simulations of Mach 2 canonical flows arising from plate-mounted swept compression ramps and sharp fins at various interaction strengths, which have been the subject of concurrent experimental campaigns. Several key structural features are discussed that distinguish 3-D interactions from 2-D interactions in the context of free-interaction principles and quasi-conical symmetry, including their relationship to strong crossflow and open separation. The virtual-conical-origin concept is augmented by considering inceptive effects, which motivate the introduction of an inceptive origin. The dependence of the inceptive-origin/virtual-conical-origin relationship with interaction strength yields several insights and provides a more rigorous framework to quantify inception strength than previously available. Finally, examination of the spanwise dependence of the growth of the quasi-conical separated shear layer shows that the outer (main) layer exhibits spanwise-homogeneous symmetry consistent with 2-D free-interaction theory, whereas the inner layer exhibits conical symmetry, consistent with 3-D (conical) free-interaction theory. The ramifications for shear layer and shock unsteadiness, as well as acceleration of the inner layer and secondary separation, are discussed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Adler et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: