What question did this study set out to answer?

This research investigates the effectiveness of live coding compared to traditional transcription methods in qualitative research.

April 20, 2019Qualitative Social Work

To live (code) or to not: A new method for coding in qualitative research

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Authors

UPUma ParameswaranUniversity of Utah JOJade L Ozawa-KirkUniversity of Utah GLGwen LatendresseUniversity of Utah

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Randomized trial compares live coding to transcription for qualitative data analysis in focus groups, suggesting benefits of preserving participant voice.

Key Points

This research investigates the effectiveness of live coding compared to traditional transcription methods in qualitative research.
Compared live coding with transcription using focus group data from a perinatal telehealth group.
Analyzed themes that emerged from both coding methods during data analysis.
Live coding preserved the participant's voice more effectively than traditional transcription.
Participants' intent, context, and meaning were better represented in the findings using live coding.

Cite This Study

Parameswaran et al. (2019) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df05d0acbf09c32e614044 https://doi.org/10.1177/1473325019840394

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Randomized trial compares live coding to transcription for qualitative data analysis in focus groups, suggesting benefits of preserving participant voice.

To live (code) or to not: A new method for coding in qualitative research

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

To live (code) or to not: A new method for coding in qualitative research

Discussion

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider