Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The competitive choice of emission taxes by two governments is analysed in a model of monopolostic competition with capital mobility where pollution externalities are regional. Assuming that governments have no other policy instrument apart from emission taxes at their disposal, I show that governments choose inefficiently low (high) taxes if the importance of emissions in production is small (large) relative to transport costs and the mark‐up. In contrast to the previous literature, the marginal disutility of pollution is not among the parameters which separate the non‐cooperative choice of emission taxes from the social planner's choice. JEL classification : F 1; H 7; Q 2
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Michael Pflüger (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: