Previously, we found that co-expression of CD25 and TNFR2 identified the most suppressive subset of mouse Treg. In this study, we report that human peripheral blood (PB) FOXP3(+) cells present in CD25(high), CD25(low) and even CD25(-) subsets of CD4(+) cells expressed high levels of TNFR2. Consequently, TNFR2-expressing CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg included all of the FOXP3(+) cells present in the CD4(+)CD25(high) subset as well as a substantial proportion of the FOXP3(+) cells present in the CD4(+)CD25(low) subset. Flow cytometric analysis of PB identified five-fold more Treg, determined by FOXP3 expression, in the CD4(+)CD25(+)TNFR2(+) subset than in the CD4(+)CD25(high) subset. In addition, similar levels of FOXP3(+) cells were identified in both the CD4(+)CD25(+)TNFR2(+) and CD4(+)CD25(+)CD127(low/-) subsets. Furthermore, the CD4(+)CD25(+)TNFR2(+) subset expressed high levels of CTLA-4, CD45RO, CCR4 and low levels of CD45RA and CD127, a phenotype characteristic of Treg. Upon TCR stimulation, human PB CD4(+)CD25(+)TNFR2(+) cells were anergic and markedly inhibited the proliferation and cytokine production of co-cultured T-responder cells. In contrast, CD4(+)CD25(+)TNFR2(-) and CD4(+)CD25(-)TNFR2(+) T cells did not show inhibitory activity. As some non-Treg express TNFR2, the combination of CD25 and TNFR2 must be used to identify a larger population of human Treg, a population that may prove to be of diagnostic and therapeutic benefit in cancer and autoimmune diseases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chen et al. (2010) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: