PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2021Field Crops Research18 citationsOpen Access

Increasing temperature shortened the carbon uptake period and decreased the cumulative net ecosystem productivity in a maize cropland in Northeast China

View Full Paper
LZLi ZhouYWYu WangQJQingyu Jia

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Phenology—mainly associated with climatic factors—is crucial for the accurate estimation of cumulative annual carbon exchange between terrestrial ecosystems and the atmosphere. However, the effects of changes in phenology on annual vegetation productivity and its regulatory mechanisms remain unclear, particularly in agricultural ecosystems. Therefore, in this study, we examined the associations among cumulative net ecosystem productivity (NEP), phenological metrics, and climatic factors based on long-term (2005–2014) eddy covariance flux and meteorological observations in a maize cropland in Northeast China. The results showed that carbon uptake period (CUP) was mainly determined by the end date of CUP (ECUP) in autumn. Cumulative NEP from May to September (NEP5−9), a period generally corresponding to the growing season, significantly increased with NEPmax (defined in this study as the 90th percentile of daily NEP during CUP) and CUP. NEPmax explained greater interannual variation in NEP5−9 than CUP. The start date of CUP (SCUP) and ECUP were both advanced with increasing winter temperature, but ECUP was more temperature-sensitive than SCUP. Thus, CUP tended to shorten with increasing temperature, ultimately decreasing cumulative NEP. In addition, NEPmax decreased with increasing precipitation in summer and autumn. The Greenup and MidGreendown dates from the MODIS Global Vegetation Phenology (MCD12Q2) product generally captured the interannual variation in the carbon flux-based SCUP and ECUP, respectively, well. The results of this study would be of great significance for predicting the response of ecosystem productivity to plant phenology shifts in agricultural ecosystems in future climate change scenarios.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Zhou et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df102158b92af24d7a0e8dhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108150
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Assessing net ecosystem carbon exchange of U.S. terrestrial ecosystems by integrating eddy covariance flux measurements and satellite observations2010 · 190 citations
  2. 2Spatial patterns and temporal dynamics in savanna vegetation phenology across the North Australian Tropical Transect2013 · 241 citations
  3. 3Trends and temperature response in the phenology of crops in Germany2007 · 289 citations
  4. 4Spatial analysis of growing season length control over net ecosystem exchange2005 · 376 citations
  5. 5Long-term trend in vegetation gross primary production, phenology and their relationships inferred from the FLUXNET data2019 · 85 citations