This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
This study examines how a set of Canadian and German firms apply the quantitative capital disclosure requirements contained in IAS 1. We find significant inter-country differences in both the propensity to disclose a capital structure and in the form of the disclosure. Further, we find variation both within and between countries in the balance sheet elements used to construct the numerators and denominators of the capital structures. When we compare the ratios constructed from the various combinations of balance sheet elements, we find significant measurement differences, in some cases exceeding 10 percentage points. When we use the ratio constructions to generate cost of capital we also find significant differences, in more than half the cases exceeding a full percentage point. Overall, our results suggest that the significant variations in capital structure disclosures and measurements we identify are potentially value relevant information for users.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elkins et al. (2017) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: