Key result
LVEF >40% linked to ~9-fold higher odds of absent LAA thrombus before AF ablation.
Why the study?
Among patients referred for AF ablation, easily accessible clinical data was evaluated to improve the selection of patients requiring TEE to exclude left atrial thrombus prior to the procedure.
Observational (n=7,874)
No
A simple clinical and echocardiographic model can identify patients at very low risk for left atrial appendage thrombus, potentially reducing unnecessary transesophageal echocardiograms before elective AF ablation.
May support selective TEE omission before AF ablation; leaves open prospective validation of risk models.
BACKGROUND: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is routinely performed before atrial fibrillation (AF) electrotherapy to exclude left atrial thrombus. AIMS: The aim of this study is to assess the real-world prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) and improve risk stratification to limit the number of unnecessary TEE examination. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 7357 TEE exams at a high-volume hospital to assess LAAT prevalence. Subsequently, we prospectively studied 517 consecutive patients in whom TEE was routinely performed prior to elective AF ablation, to assess LAAT and spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) prevalence. RESULTS: LAAT was detected in only 1.5% (108/7357) of all TEE studies performed for various indications. In elective AF ablation patients, LAAT or dense SEC was found in only 1.6% of cases (8/511).Predictors of LAAT/SEC were as follows: persistent AF over one year (odds ratio [OR], 0.20; 95%confidence interval [CI], 0.05-0.7; P = 0.012), and at least moderate valvular heart disease or postvalve repair/replacement status (OR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.22-0.98; P = 0.044). Conversely, the identified protective factors included the following: CHA₂DS₂-VA score <4 points (OR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.01-4.32;P = 0.046), left atrial volume index <51.5 ml/m² (OR, 2.9; 95% CI, 1.37-6.14; P = 0.005), N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide <956.5 pg/ml (OR, 4.2; 95% CI, 1.98-9.12; P <0.001), and left ventricular ejection fraction >40% (OR, 9.5; 95% CI, 4.29-20.86; P <0.001). A point score and nomogram were developed to predict the odds of absence of LAAT/SEC. CONCLUSIONS: Among the patients referred to AF ablation, easily accessible clinical data may improve selection of patients who truly require TEE to exclude LAAT prior to the procedure. Further studies are needed to independently validate the proposed risk assessment model.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ostrowska-Kaim et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Atrial fibrillation (n=7,874). Left ventricular ejection fraction >40% vs. Left ventricular ejection fraction ≤40% was evaluated on Absence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAAT) or spontaneous echocardiographic contrast (SEC) (OR 9.5, 95% CI 4.29-20.86, p=<0.001). Among patients referred for atrial fibrillation ablation, the prevalence of left atrial appendage thrombus was only 1.6%, and left ventricular ejection fraction >40% strongly predicted its absence (OR 9.5).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: