Mixed-method research examines how AI literacy influences students’ learning behavior, indicating actionable insights for universities.
While GenAI is transforming education, it remains unclear how it shapes students’ behavior, especially concerning AI literacy. The purpose of this study is to examine which factors positively affect students’ learning behavior and whether AI literacy moderates this effect, using the COM-B model. An online survey of 438 participants was analyzed using covariance-based structural equation modeling (CB-SEM) and fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA). The CB-SEM results indicate that independent learning ability, receptive ability, learning environment, AI support equipment, and both intrinsic and extrinsic motivations significantly shape student learning behavior. Notably, AI literacy moderates the relationship between GenAI and learning behavior. Furthermore, fsQCA reveals seven configurations of these factors that favorably impact learning behavior. Together, these findings provide theoretical and practical insights for universities, highlighting actionable ways universities can support students’ adoption of GenAI.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: