PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Journal of Mammalogy0 citations

Geographic, subspecific, and sexual drivers of phenotypic variation in the Cave Bat ( Myotis velifer )

View Full Paper
ANAndrew J. NewmanTexas Tech UniversityJSJohn D. StuhlerTexas Tech UniversityRSR StevensTexas Tech University

Key Points

  • This research aims to examine the sources of phenotypic variation in Myotis velifer, focusing on sexual, geographic, and subspecific differences.
  • Measured cranial characters in 195 specimens from 98 sites across recognized subspecies.
  • Assessed differences in cranial characteristics among sexes and subspecies.
  • Utilized multivariate analyses to relate cranial variation to spatial and environmental gradients.
  • Significant cranial differences were found among subspecies, but no differences between sexes.
  • Spatial gradients explained unique variation in cranial morphology, while subspecies designation did not.
  • Larger phenotypes were associated with environments exhibiting more variable temperatures.

Abstract

Abstract Phenotypic variation can assume multiple forms including sexual dimorphism, geographic and subspecific differences, or morphological clines along environmental gradients. Importantly, these sources of variation may interact, especially across large spatial and/or temporal extents. Moreover, subspecies delineations are often based on discontinuities in phenotypic variation thought to represent distinct populations. We examined phenotypic variation within Myotis velifer, a bat species distributed across the southwestern United States and Mexico to Honduras. We measured a series of cranial characters from 195 specimens from 98 sites of the 3 currently recognized subspecies (M. v. incautus, M. v. magnamolaris, and M. v. velifer) to identify potential differences among sexes and subspecies. We also used multivariate analyses to relate variation in cranial characteristics to spatial and environmental gradients. We found significant differences in cranial characters among subspecies, but no differences between sexes and no sex-by-subspecies interactions. We also demonstrated that spatial gradients but not subspecies designation or sex explained significant unique variation in cranial morphology. Climatic gradients were primarily characterized by larger phenotypes in environments with more variable temperatures. Results from this work question existing subspecific designations for this species as well as demonstrate the importance of accounting for geographic clines when examining phenotypic variation in the context of subspecific delineation.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Newman et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bece4eeef8a2a6b0db6https://doi.org/10.1093/jmammal/gyag019
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper