What question did this study set out to answer?

To examine how informal clinician interactions and internalized knowledge structures influence the dissemination and application of best practice evidence.

July 28, 2016British Journal of General PracticeOpen Access

Mindlines: making sense of evidence in practice

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

To examine how informal clinician interactions and internalized knowledge structures influence the dissemination and application of best practice evidence.
Analyzed conceptual models of evidence adoption and knowledge translation in clinical healthcare environments.
Evaluated the impact of peer-to-peer discussions and tacit knowledge networks on formal guideline adherence.
Informal clinician communication serves as a primary vehicle for transforming complex scientific evidence into usable, internalized practice guidelines.
Unstructured social exchanges can either accelerate or obstruct the implementation of evidence-based medical interventions depending on peer group dynamics.

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Implication

Qualitative review demonstrates the transmission of clinical evidence in healthcare professionals, indicating that informal conversations govern the spread of best practice.

Cite This Study

Gabbay et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2bef3b0ba53fb37a1d04 https://doi.org/10.3399/bjgp16x686221

View Full Paper

Ask AI

Bookmark

Implication

Qualitative review demonstrates the transmission of clinical evidence in healthcare professionals, indicating that informal conversations govern the spread of best practice.

Mindlines: making sense of evidence in practice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Mindlines: making sense of evidence in practice

Key Points

Discussion

Implication

Cite This Study

Also Consider

Also Consider