PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 15, 2026Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment2 citationsOpen Access

Subsistence harvest for food and pets associated with declining global mammal populations

View Full Paper
JHJacob E. HillKKKenneth F KellnerMichigan Department of Natural ResourcesJBJerrold L BelantMichigan Department of Natural Resources

Key Points

  • Assess the impact of subsistence harvest on the conservation status of terrestrial mammal species worldwide.
  • Analyzed trade and use data from the IUCN Red List
  • Examined the effects of subsistence harvest on 1723 terrestrial mammal species
  • Focused on five types of subsistence use, particularly food and pets
  • Species harvested for subsistence showed more likely decreasing population trends
  • Food was the most common type of subsistence use affecting over two-thirds of species
  • Only food and pets were strongly linked to declining population trends

Abstract

Subsistence harvest can have substantial impacts on mammalian biodiversity, yet its effects on the conservation status of mammal species are poorly understood. We analyzed trade and use data in species accounts from the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) Red List to examine the effects of subsistence harvest on the conservation status of 1723 terrestrial mammal species worldwide. Species harvested for subsistence were more likely to have decreasing population trends. Among five types of subsistence use examined, only two types of use—for food and pets—were associated with declining population trends. Food was the most common subsistence use, affecting more than two‐thirds of all mammal species examined. We suggest that current harvesting levels of wild mammals for subsistence, especially as food, may contribute to extinction risk because decreasing populations are a precursor to being listed in a threatened IUCN Red List category. However, other factors, such as habitat loss, likely also play a role. Improved harvest management is therefore needed to maintain mammal populations as ecological and food resources.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Hill et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df2cb9e4eeef8a2a6b1febhttps://doi.org/10.1002/fee.70044
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1The widespread keeping of wild pets in the Neotropics: An overlooked risk for human, livestock and wildlife health2024 · 15 citations
  2. 2A Linear-Time Algorithm for Gaussian and Non-Gaussian Trait Evolution Models2014 · 1,182 citations
  3. 3Wildlife farming: Balancing economic and conservation interests in the face of illegal wildlife trade2024 · 24 citations
  4. 4A framework for evaluating the effectiveness of conservation attention at the species level2014 · 19 citations
  5. 5Cause‐specific mortality of the world’s terrestrial vertebrates2019 · 212 citations