PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
May 5, 2021Behavior Research Methods569 citationsOpen Access

Estimating power in (generalized) linear mixed models: An open introduction and tutorial in R

LKLevi KumleMVMelissa L.‐H. VõDDDejan Draschkow

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Mixed-effects models are a powerful tool for modeling fixed and random effects simultaneously, but do not offer a feasible analytic solution for estimating the probability that a test correctly rejects the null hypothesis. Being able to estimate this probability, however, is critical for sample size planning, as power is closely linked to the reliability and replicability of empirical findings. A flexible and very intuitive alternative to analytic power solutions are simulation-based power analyses. Although various tools for conducting simulation-based power analyses for mixed-effects models are available, there is lack of guidance on how to appropriately use them. In this tutorial, we discuss how to estimate power for mixed-effects models in different use cases: first, how to use models that were fit on available (e.g. published) data to determine sample size; second, how to determine the number of stimuli required for sufficient power; and finally, how to conduct sample size planning without available data. Our examples cover both linear and generalized linear models and we provide code and resources for performing simulation-based power analyses on openly accessible data sets. The present work therefore helps researchers to navigate sound research design when using mixed-effects models, by summarizing resources, collating available knowledge, providing solutions and tools, and applying them to real-world problems in sample sizing planning when sophisticated analysis procedures like mixed-effects models are outlined as inferential procedures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kumle et al. (2021) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df3df93b0ba53fb37a2179https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01546-0
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Monte Carlo Experiments: Design and Implementation2001 · 346 citations
  2. 2Power Analysis by Simulation using R and simglm2019 · 11 citations
  3. 3Why Most Published Research Findings Are False2005 · 10,753 citations
  4. 4Type I and Type II Error Under Random‐Effects Misspecification in Generalized Linear Mixed Models2007 · 127 citations
  5. 5Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences1990 · 65,689 citations