Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The axial stiffness of the three implants was similar in models I to III. The biomechanical properties of PFNA were the best of the three implants in terms of axial stiffness, failure load, and fatigue testing cycles in model IV. The axial stiffness and failure load of the PFLP were better than those of the reverse LISS, but PFLP had fewer cycles in the fatigue tests than the reverse LISS.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2022) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: