This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
We argue that doctors should err on the side of greater diagnostic uncertainty communication: to not do so (eg, based on benign paternalistic ideas about avoiding patient worry) or to do so variably (eg, based on unevidenced assumptions about patient information preferences) risks depriving patients of information they may value and may create or exacerbate inequalities.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cox et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: