PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
June 12, 2013Bird Study36 citations

Should we account for detectability in population trends?

View Full Paper
SNStuart E. NewsonBritish Trust for OrnithologyDMDario MassiminoBritish Trust for OrnithologyAJAlison JohnstonUniversity of St Andrews

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Abstract

Capsule Accounting for changes in detectability over time which could invalidate population trends for common and widespread breeding birds in the UK, resulted in little change in trends for the majority of species considered. Aims To examine whether detectability has a significant influence on population trends for common and widespread breeding birds in the UK. Methods Using data collected over 16 years of the UK Breeding Bird Survey (1994–2009) and focusing on a random sample of 20 common and widespread bird species, we examine the extent to which controlling for temporal change in detectability would influence national population trends. Results Population trends were significantly different for only 2 of the 20 species, Common Blackbird and Winter Wren. This difference corresponds to an apparent fall off in detectability of these species between 2005 and 2009. For the remaining species, controlling for detectability resulted in no significant difference in population trends. Conclusions The importance of detectability should be examined as part of any long-term monitoring programme. However, currently we do not find sufficient support for routinely incorporating detectability into population trends for widespread and abundant breeding birds in the UK.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Newson et al. (2013) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69df6e57915fa04953614b8dhttps://doi.org/10.1080/00063657.2013.805729
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper