This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
Heteroepitaxy of complex oxide thin films is a significant challenge when a large mismatch in the lattice parameters (>8%) and difference in the crystallographic symmetry coexist between the film and substrate. Herein, the heteroepitaxial growth of a hexagonal delafossite CuFeO 2 thin film with (00.1) orientation on a cubic perovskite (001) SrTiO 3 substrate through translational and rotational domain matching epitaxy is reported. The rotational in‐plane domain orientation relationships are CuFeO 2 [11.0]//SrTiO 3 [110] and CuFeO 2 [2.0]//SrTiO 3 [110] with about 10% in‐plane lattice mismatch. The 14.8 nm‐thick (00.1) CuFeO 2 thin film shows high‐crystalline quality with a full width at half maximum of rocking curve of about 0.24° and exhibits a possible indirect optical bandgap of 1.43 eV or direct optical bandgap of 1.94 eV. Herein, not only a model system demonstrating translational and rotational domain matching heteroepitaxy of complex oxides is reported, but also a way to thin‐film heterostructures integrating hexagonal delafossite with cubic perovskite materials for functional oxide devices is opened.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: