Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this study, in-situ and laboratory γ-ray spectroscopy techniques were compared to evaluate the activity concentration of natural radionuclides in soil. The activity concentrations of ²³⁸U (²²⁶Ra), ²³²Th, and ⁴⁰K in the soil in 11 sites were simultaneously measured with in-situ portable HPGe and the NaI(Tl) detectors. In parallel, 55 soil samples collected from these sites were analyzed with a laboratory γ-ray spectroscopy technique (HPGe). A strong correlation was observed between the in-situ and laboratory HPGe techniques with a linear correlation coefficient (R²) of 0.99 for ²²⁶Ra and ²³²Th and 0.975 for ⁴⁰K, respectively. The in-situ HPGe technique shows a strong correlation with the NaI(Tl) detector. γ-Rays cps of ²²⁶Ra, ²³²Th, and ⁴⁰K of the NaI (Tl) detector were then converted to specific activities (Bq kg⁻¹ unit) in soil using the empirical formulas obtained in this study. The absorbed dose rate in air at 1 m height above ground due to these radionuclides was calculated using the Beck's formula and the results were compared with measured values obtained with an high pressure ionization chamber. The results of the calculated and measured dose rate show a strong correlation of R² = 0.96. The reliability and precision of analytical spectroscopy techniques of radioactivity and radiation dose were confirmed in this work.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hassan et al. (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: