Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
When cynical distance and ironic posturing have become the prevalent means of relating to public life, political humour is no longer considered subversive. It has been argued that both in Russia and the United States, ideology has co-opted satire, meaning that citizens can consume outrage passively through various satirical media products, thereby displacing outrage and abstaining from more active forms of resistance. This articles explores the twenty-first century potential of irony and cynicism to disrupt and subvert through parody, be it in the form of political satire or ironic protest, examining how similar paradigms are expressed across different geographical contexts.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maria Brock (2018) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: