Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective and subjective methods provide differing information on microvascular function in RP. There is good convergent validity of LSCI with IRT and acceptable reproducibility of both modalities. Neither subjective nor objective assessments could differentiate between primary RP and SSc. Influence of sex on subjective and objective assessment of RP warrants further evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pauling et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: