PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
January 1, 2016Archives of Medical Science1,519 citationsOpen Access

2D and 3D cell cultures – a comparison of different types of cancer cell cultures

MKMarta KapałczyńskaTKTomasz KolendaWPWeronika Przybyła

Key Points

  • To compare conventional two-dimensional (2D) in vitro cell cultures with three-dimensional (3D) models and evaluate different 3D systems in cancer research.
  • Reviewed literature comparing standard 2D monolayer cell cultures against diverse 3D in vitro culture models.
  • Evaluated structural and functional parameters, including cell morphology, polarity, division mechanisms, and extracellular interactions.
  • Standard 2D cell cultures disrupt normal cell-matrix interactions and alter cellular morphology, polarity, and division.
  • Three-dimensional (3D) models more faithfully replicate in vivo tumor environments, improving the study of cancer biomarkers and targeted drug therapies.

Abstract

Cell culture is a widely used in vitro tool for improving our understanding of cell biology, tissue morphology, and mechanisms of diseases, drug action, protein production and the development of tissue engineering. Most research regarding cancer biology is based on experiments using two-dimensional (2D) cell cultures in vitro. However, 2D cultures have many limitations, such as the disturbance of interactions between the cellular and extracellular environments, changes in cell morphology, polarity, and method of division. These disadvantages led to the creation of models which are more closely able to mimic conditions in vivo. One such method is three-dimensional culture (3D). Optimisation of the culture conditions may allow for a better understanding of cancer biology and facilitate the study of biomarkers and targeting therapies. In this review, we compare 2D and 3D cultures in vitro as well as different versions of 3D cultures.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Kapałczyńska et al. (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e005be93e101b251e9c6eahttps://doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2016.63743
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper