Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
There are two common misconceptions about case-control studies: that matching in itself eliminates (controls) confounding by the matching factors, and that if matching has been performed, then a “matched analysis” is required. However, matching in a case-control study does not control for confounding by the matching factors; in fact it can introduce confounding by the matching factors even when it did not exist in the source population. Thus, a matched design may require controlling for the matching factors in the analysis. However, it is not the case that a matched design requires a matched analysis. Provided that there are no problems of sparse data, control for the matching factors can be obtained, with no loss of validity and a possible increase in precision, using a “standard” (unconditional) analysis, and a “matched” (conditional) analysis may not be required or appropriate.
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Neil Pearce
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1
BMJ
London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine
Massey University
Building similarity graph...
Analyzing shared references across papers
Loading...
Neil Pearce (Thu,) studied this question.
synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07500f289ddaa86459087 — DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.i969