The systematic review concludes that future research should focus on high-quality RCTs for preparticipation screening and prevention of groin injuries in high-risk athletes.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No proven benefit for groin injury screening or prevention programs; leaves open efficacy pending high-quality RCTs in athletes.
We recommended that investigators focus on developing and evaluating preparticipation screening and groin injury prevention programmes through high-quality randomised controlled trials targeting athletes at greater risk of injury.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Whittaker et al. (2015) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: