PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Energy0 citationsOpen Access

Energy efficiency, carbon footprint, and profitability of winter wheat under different production types and cultivation patterns: A 12-year field study

View Full Paper
SLShuang LiSASunusi Amin AbubakarHLHuijie LI

Key Points

  • The study aims to evaluate the sustainability of different wheat production systems in terms of energy, carbon, and economic output.
  • Conducted a 12-year field experiment in North China Plain.
  • Evaluated four wheat production systems with varying production types and cultivation patterns.
  • Assessed grain yield, energy budgets, carbon footprint, and economic performance.
  • C-HLSC consistently outperformed other treatments in multiple dimensions of sustainability.
  • Increased grain yield by 12.1% and net income by 67.7% compared to S-FC.
  • Achieved a benefit-cost ratio exceeding unity (1.06) with the lowest carbon footprint (0.66 kg CE kg -1).

Abstract

Sustainable grain production in the North China Plain (NCP) faces persistent yield–environment trade-offs. High–low seedbed cultivation (HLSC) offers yield benefits, yet long-term field evidence integrating energy, environmental, and economic performance across different production organizations remains limited. Here, a 12-year field experiment was conducted to evaluate four wheat production systems formed by the combination of two production types (cooperative vs. smallholder farming) and two cultivation patterns (HLSC vs. flat cultivation, FC). Grain yield, energy budgets, carbon footprint, soil carbon sequestration, and economic performance were assessed to quantify system-level sustainability outcomes. Results showed that cooperative farming combined with high-low seedbed cultivation (C-HLSC) consistently outperformed other treatments across multiple sustainability dimensions. Compared with the smallholder with flat cultivation (S-FC), C-HLSC increased grain yield by 12.1% and net income by 67.7%, while achieving the only benefit–cost ratio exceeding unity (1.06). Despite relatively low energy input (29.23 GJ ha -1 ), C-HLSC produced the highest net energy output (269.6 GJ ha -1 ), resulting in superior energy-use efficiency (10.3) and energy productivity (0.31 kg MJ -1 ). Simultaneously, carbon performance improved markedly, with the lowest grain-scaled carbon footprint (0.66 kg CE kg -1 ) and the greatest annual soil organic carbon sequestration (698.0 kg CO 2 -eq ha -1 ). These improvements indicate that enhanced productivity diluted energy and carbon intensity while coordinated farm management improved operational efficiency and economic returns. Overall, the C-HLSC pattern therefore represents a practical pathway for advancing energy-efficient and low-carbon wheat production, providing empirical support for policies promoting cooperative farming and resource-efficient cultivation strategies in the NCP and comparable agroecosystems worldwide. • A long-term field experiment was conducted to assess yield, energy and carbon budgeting under different production type and cultivation pattern. • Cooperative farming increased 3.4% grain yield, 15.1% energy use efficiency, and 39.8% net return, while decreased 5.5% carbon footprint. • High-low seedbed cultivation increased 8.2% grain yield and 19.9% net return, while decreased 9.7% carbon footprint. • Cooperative combined with high-low seedbed cultivation achieved highest energy use efficiency and economic benefit, together with the lowest carbon footprint.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Li et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07c632f7e8953b7cbd99chttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2026.141029
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper