Evaluates thiol-based fluorescent probes for selective detection and inhibition of metallo-β-lactamases, suggesting important structural insights.
Metallo-β-lactamases (MBLs)—Zn2+-dependent β-lactamases that compromise the efficacy of most β-lactam antibiotics, including carbapenems—are difficult to monitor rapidly with broadly applicable small-molecule probes due to the structural diversity among the MBLs. Fluorescent thiol-based probes that bind to the dinuclear Zn2+ active site would offer a mechanistically different approach for the selective detection and inhibition of MBLs compared to serine β-lactamases (SBLs); however, their performance across genetically divergent MBLs remains poorly defined. To clarify the structural determinants governing probe recognition across different MBLs, we examined the structure–activity relationships using a homologous series of dansyl-based thiol probes, DansylCnSH (n = 2 and 4–6) toward BlaB, a class B MBL of Elizabethkingia meningoseptica, and compared their behavior with those of the clinically relevant MBLs imipenemase-1 (IMP-1) and Verona integron-encoded metallo-β-lactamase 2 (VIM-2). Consistent with the minimal differences in fluorescence enhancement among the series, BlaB inhibition exhibited only modest spacer-length dependence (IC50 = 29–51 μM; apparent inhibition constants (Kiapp) = 3600–5910 nM). In contrast, IMP-1 and VIM-2 showed markedly stronger fluorescence emission and inhibitory potencies (IMP-1: IC50 = 0.7–5.2 μM; Kiapp = 140–1100 nM; VIM-2: IC50 = 1.5–2.1 μM; Kiapp = 286–370 nM), reflecting their distinct active-site architectures. Docking analyses further revealed distinct binding orientations that explain their photophysical behaviors. No fluorescence enhancement or inhibition was observed with the class A SBL Guiana extended-spectrum β-lactamase-3 (GES-3), confirming the high selectivity and specificity of the DansylCnSH series. These findings allow identifying key structural determinants governing selective activation and inhibition of fluorescence from each MBL.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kato et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: