Academic analysis explores non-majoritarian institutions' effects on democracy amidst dissensus and challenges in Europe.
This paper introduces the Special Section ‘Non-Majoritarian Instruments and Institutions: Dissensus and Democracy in Europe’, which examines the role of non-majoritarian institutions and instruments in contemporary European democracies amid growing dissensus and democratic decline. The Special Section, which constitutes a collective academic effort from a number of European legal scholars engaged in the EU-funded REDSPINEL Project, critically analyses the role of non-majoritarian instruments and institutions with respect to three challenges that shape contemporary democracies in Europe: economic inequality and discrimination, growing authoritarianism, and the pressing climate crisis.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Armeni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: