Narrative review uncovers the evolution of ETC infrastructure into cooperative control nodes, suggesting integration for intelligent expressway transformation.
Following China’s completion of the removal of provincial boundary toll stations and expressway network integration reform, a large number of electronic toll collection (ETC) gantries were deployed along expressway mainlines nationwide, transforming these facilities from dedicated toll terminals into pervasive traffic-sensing infrastructure covering the entire road network. However, the data value and technological potential embedded in this major infrastructure transformation have not yet been systematically reviewed. This paper adopts a narrative review methodology, incorporating 71 publications identified through multi-database systematic searches. The review is organized along the functional upgrade path of ETC gantries, covering the progression from toll terminals to traffic sensing nodes, multi-source fusion hubs, and finally vehicle–road–cloud cooperative control nodes, and synthesizes research progress in expressway traffic sensing, multi-source data fusion, safety operations, and emerging applications. The review reveals that ETC data have enabled a diverse methodological repertoire spanning travel time estimation, traffic flow prediction, origin–destination (OD) matrix inference, toll plaza safety analysis, dynamic pricing strategies, and environmental impact assessment. Nevertheless, a single ETC data source suffers from inherent limitations: spatial–temporal resolution constrained by gantry spacing and real-time capability limited by transmission latency. This fundamental contradiction constitutes the core driving force behind multi-source data fusion and vehicle–road–cloud integration technologies. The paper further argues that establishing a closed-loop pipeline integrating sensing, fusion, decision, and control and anchored on ETC gantry nodes represents the key direction for realizing intelligent expressway transformation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Luo et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: