Innovative neural architecture processes acoustic features of Sanskrit roots, suggesting new semantic organization methods.
We present the Devavāṇī-Derived Interpretable Network (DDIN), a neural architecture for semantic representation grounded in the physical acoustics of speech production rather than statistical co-occurrence. The DDIN Receiver Model processes Sanskrit verbal roots by converting their acoustic formant profiles (F1, F2 frequencies derived from source-filter theory and locus equations) into heterogeneous Leaky Integrate-and-Fire (LIF) spike trains, which drive a reservoir governed solely by Bienenstock-Cooper-Munro (BCM) local plasticity. No global error signal, backpropagation, or word-level semantic labels are used at any stage. We prove formally that (i) the resonance state update of the DDIN is structurally identical to Mamba's selective state-space recurrence via zero-order-hold discretization; (ii) under BCM dynamics, the fixed-point weight matrix maximizes an explicit objective proportional to output variance minus a threshold-penalty term; (iii) the harmonic coherence metric H over the phonosemantic manifold M is a proper pseudometric satisfying the triangle inequality; and (iv) the morphophonological junction operator is an associative, surjective partial function on phoneme sequences, with a computable complexity O(1) per application. Empirically, we report that the 23-dimensional formant-first v16 embedding achieves ARI = 0.0366 on the 150-root Paninian benchmark against independently-derived phenomenological axis labels, without any optimization. We further show that formant geometry provides +14 percentage points over phoneme identity alone (linear probe, p < 0.001). These results constitute the first empirical proof that bodily-grounded phonological representations organize into semantic categories without gradient-based optimization. The architecture achieves O(1) context memory and O(L) time, with interpretable state coordinates that Mamba's latent vectors lack.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dr. Amit Kumar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: