PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Nature of Indian Political Parties: Polarisation and Fragmentation

View Full Paper
PAPreeti Awasthi

Key Points

  • The article aims to analyze the characteristics of the Indian political party system and the effects of polarization and fragmentation.
  • Examines the historical context of the Indian party system, focusing on its anti-colonial origins.
  • Analyzes the impact of significant coalitions and political movements on party dynamics.
  • Discusses factors contributing to fragmentation such as factionalism and regionalism.
  • Identifies a shift from one-party dominance to multiple party fragmentation influenced by ideology and leadership differences.
  • Finds that polarization often stems from efforts to challenge dominant parties rather than cohesive policies.
  • Suggests that current fragmentation undermines political stability despite increased competition.

Abstract

The article analyzes the Indian party system through the dynamics of polarization and fragmentation. It argues that the system’s distinctive character stems from its origin in the anti-colonial movement led by the Indian National Congress, which functioned as a broad umbrella organization rather than a class- or ideology-based party. This led initially to a phase of one-party dominance, followed by fragmentation as ideological and leadership differences produced multiple parties. The study shows that efforts at political consolidation—such as the formation of the Janata Party and later coalitions like the National Democratic Alliance—reflect attempts at polarization, often driven more by the goal of displacing dominant parties than by coherent policy agendas. At the same time, factionalism, personality-based leadership, regionalism, and weak intra-party democracy have reinforced fragmentation.The article concludes that while polarization can strengthen competition, its largely negative and opportunistic character, combined with persistent fragmentation, undermines political stability. Institutional reforms such as constructive no-confidence mechanisms and electoral changes are suggested to address these challenges.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Preeti Awasthi (2016) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d1d2f7e8953b7cbe227https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19564394
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper