PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 2026Educational Psychology Review2 citationsOpen Access

Classroom Active Breaks as a Physical-Educational Intervention for Executive Functions and Mathematical Outcomes: a Systematic Review with Meta-Analysis

EMEduardo Melguizo-IbáñezFZFélix Zurita-OrtegaPTPedro Tadeu

Key Points

  • The study investigates the impact of active breaks on executive functions and mathematical performance in schoolchildren.
  • Conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of 35 articles
  • Sample included 7701 students aged 6 to 16
  • Analyzed effects of break intensity, duration, and modality on outcomes
  • Utilized Robust Variance Estimation for effect size calculations
  • Found a small positive effect on working memory (g = 0.14, p = 0.04)
  • Moderate-to-vigorous intensity breaks improved working memory (β = 0.25, p = 0.02)
  • Other cognitive and academic outcomes did not show statistically significant effects

Abstract

The present study aimed (a) to examine, through a systematic review and meta-analysis, the effects of active breaks on attention, inhibitory control, working memory, and mathematical outcomes in schoolchildren and (b) to analyse whether break intensity, duration and modality moderate the effects of active breaks on executive function and mathematical outcomes. A systematic search was conducted in Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, APA PsycArticles, APA PsycINFO, EBSCO, PubMed, Cochrane Library, Applied Social Sciences Index and Abstracts and ProQuest between November 2025 and February 2026. The quantitative synthesis consisted of 35 scientific articles. The total sample was 7701 students between 6 and 16 years old. Robust Variance Estimation was applied to account for dependent effect sizes within studies. Results suggest a small but statistically significant positive effect on working memory (g = 0.14, 95% CI 0.002, 0.288, p = 0.04). Exploratory meta-regression findings suggest that moderate-to-vigorous intensity, compared to moderate intensity, was associated with a small but significant improvement in working memory (β = 0.25, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.45, p = 0.02). In conclusion, active breaks may have a small positive effect on working memory, though effects on other cognitive and academic outcomes were not statistically significant. Meta-regression results suggest that higher intensity breaks could be associated with slightly greater improvements in working memory, but these findings should be interpreted cautiously. The limited and observational nature of the moderating evidence highlights the need for more rigorously designed studies to clarify how specific characteristics of active breaks relate to cognitive and academic outcomes.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Melguizo-Ibáñez et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07d732f7e8953b7cbe58ahttps://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-026-10146-3
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Breaking up classroom sitting time with cognitively engaging physical activity: Behavioural and brain responses2021 · 47 citations
  2. 2Active breaks as a physical education strategy to develop attention, concentration and attentional variability in higher education2026
  3. 3Effect of classroom physical activity breaks on learning behaviors and academic achievements in university students: a systematic review2026
  4. 4Systematic review of the effects of active breaks on the cognition of secondary school and university students2025
  5. 5Effect of breaking up prolonged sitting with physical activity on executive function: a three-level meta-analysis2026