PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 16, 20260 citationsOpen Access

The Predatory Peace: Oil Rents, Elite Bargaining, and the Reproduction of Organised Violence in South Sudan, 2005-2023

View Full Paper
AEAfrican Political Economy

Key Points

  • The research aims to explain how oil-financed elite bargains sustain organized violence in South Sudan from 2005 to 2023.
  • Analyzed three peace agreement cycles: Comprehensive Peace Agreement (2005), Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (2015), Revitalised ARCSS (2018)
  • Utilized rentier state theory and political settlements analysis
  • Conducted process tracing and elite interviews
  • Performed budget execution analysis
  • Peace agreements primarily serve elite revenue management rather than conflict resolution
  • External mediation efforts have institutionalized a political economy of predation
  • Control over oil revenue has intensified political competition and conflict

Abstract

This study advances the concept of "predatory peace" to explain how oil-financed elite bargains in South Sudan have systematically reproduced, rather than terminated, organised violence between 2005 and 2023. Drawing on rentier state theory, political settlements analysis, and war economies literature, it examines three peace agreement cycles—the Comprehensive Peace Agreement (2005), the Agreement on the Resolution of the Conflict in South Sudan (2015), and the Revitalised ARCSS (2018)—to show how control over Nilepet and oil revenue disbursement has functioned as the primary medium of political competition. Using process tracing, elite interviews, and budget execution analysis, the study demonstrates that peace agreements in resource-rich fragile states often operate as instruments of elite revenue management rather than mechanisms of conflict resolution. The findings challenge dominant liberal peacebuilding frameworks, revealing how external mediation efforts have inadvertently institutionalised a political economy of predation that incentivises continued armed contestation. It contributes to scholarship on the political economy of peace processes while offering policy-relevant insights for mediation design, conditionality frameworks, and the political economy of DDR in resource-dependent post-conflict settings.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

African Political Economy (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e07dfe2f7e8953b7cbef73https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.19570637
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predatory Peace and the Oil-Rent State: Elite Bargaining and the Reproduction of Organised Violence in South Sudan, 2005-20232026
  2. 2The Predatory Peace: A Framework of Elite Bargaining, Oil Rents, and the Reproduction of Organised Violence in South Sudan, 2021–20262022
  3. 3The Predatory Peace: Oil Rents, Elite Bargaining, and the Reproduction of Organised Violence in South Sudan,2021
  4. 4The Illusion of Finality: A Critical Analysis of Elite Bargaining and Institutional Fragility in South Sudan's Revitalised Peace Agreement2021
  5. 5Beyond the Revitalised Agreement: A Critical Perspective on the Political Economy of Stalemate in South Sudan2024