Multicenter study reveals therapeutic inertia in managing renal risk in non-dialysis CKD patients, indicating a need for better adherence to guidelines.
Introduction.Awareness of implementation of guideline-directed nephroprotective therapy (GDNT) is an essential preliminary step to optimize implementation of nephroprotective strategies in non-dialysis CKD (ND-CKD).However, no updated information on this issue is available in the setting of nephrology clinics. Methods.In this multicenter prospective study we collected data of 4,523 patients with ND-CKD, either stage 3-5 or 1-2 with ACR>30 mg/g, followed in 30 Italian nephrology clinics in two visits with a 6-month interval between May/2024-May/2025 to evaluate current phenotypes of patients under tertiary nephrology care, and management of the two major modifiable determinants of renal risk, hypertension and albumin-creatinine ratio (ACR), including therapeutic inertia. Results.The cohort was characterized by a severe cardiorenal risk profile: men 65%, age 7114y, diabetes 40%, cardiovascular disease 40%, eGFR 3419 mL/min/1.73m 2 , ACR 70 mg/g .At month-6 visit, in patients with and without diabetes, home and office blood pressure (OBP) were above target in about 70% patients, with high prevalence of sustained (62%) and resistant (23%) hypertension.Among patients with uncontrolled OBP, 43% and 33% of nondiabetic and diabetic patients were prescribed 2 BP lowering drugs.ACR>30 mg/g persisted in 61% of nondiabetic and 64% of diabetic patients with frequent occurrence of therapeutic inertia for antialbuminuric agents at month-6: 85% for RAS inhibitors, 90% for gliflozins, and, among patients with diabetes, 92% for GLP1-RA and 96% for finerenone.Conclusions.The large majority of patients with ND-CKD currently followed in Italian renal clinics is characterized by a severe risk profile that is paradoxically associated with remarkable therapeutic inertia for traditional and innovative GDNT.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nicola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: