Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
CORTADO improves clustering accuracy and identifies specific markers in various datasets, indicating its effectiveness.
The advent of single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has enhanced our ability to study cellular heterogeneity. Accurately identifying distinct subpopulations and their defining markers is critical for understanding tissue diversity. We introduce CORTADO, a hill-climbing optimization framework for marker discovery and clustering refinement. CORTADO maximizes differential expression, minimizes redundancy via cosine similarity, and enforces sparsity for interpretability. By using CORTADO-selected markers to inform the cell-type identification process, an iterative refinement approach markedly increases the Adjusted Rand Index (ARI), a metric that quantifies how well the clustering assignments align with gold-standard cell-type annotations. Benchmarking across brain, immune, spatial, and cancer datasets confirms that CORTADO delivers biologically relevant markers and consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods in both marker discovery and clustering accuracy.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lodi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: