Key result
Combined lumbosacral plexus block linked to ~64% fewer complications vs combined spinal-epidural in elderly hip surgery.
Why the study?
Hip fractures in the elderly carry high morbidity and mortality, making optimization of anesthesia care essential to improve outcomes.
Does the choice of anesthesia technique (CSE, CLSB, or GA) affect perioperative complications and outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Observational (n=126)
No
Does the choice of anesthesia technique (CSE, CLSB, or GA) affect perioperative complications and outcomes in geriatric patients undergoing hip fracture surgery?
Absolute Event Rate: 20% vs 55%
p-value: p=0.001
In geriatric hip fracture surgery, combined lumbosacral plexus block demonstrated better hemodynamic stability and lower complication rates compared to combined spinal-epidural and general anesthesia.
CLSB associated with lowest complications and mortality; leaves open optimal anesthesia choice pending randomized trials.
Background and Aim: Hip fractures in the elderly are a rising global public health problem with high morbidity and mortality. Optimizing quality anesthesia care to improve patient outcomes is essential. We aimed to appraise anesthesia techniques in elderly patients with hip fractures, with the objective of comparing the perioperative course, complications, and outcomes. Methodology: A retrospective observational study was conducted after approval by the ethics committee at a tertiary care public institute. During the 1-year study period, we audited anesthesia techniques for hip fracture surgeries in patients >60 years and compared hemodynamic parameters, complications, and postoperative outcome using Epi Info version 7.2. Results: A total of 126 patients (mean age 78 ± 2.2 years) received combined spinal, epidural (CSE) ( n = 76, 60%), combined lumbosacral plexus block (CLSB) ( n = 40, 32%), or general anesthesia (GA) ( n = 10, 8%). Overall complications occurred in 42 patients (55%) with CSE, 8 (20%) with CLSB, and 3 (30%) with GA ( P = 0.001). Hypotension and acute kidney injury were significantly associated with CSE ( P = 0.001). GA was associated with the highest mortality (30%) compared to CSE (9.2%) and CLSB (5%) ( P = 0.007). Conclusion: In geriatric hip surgery, CSE (60%) was the technique of choice, and CLSB (32%) and GA (8%) were used for specific indications in high-risk patients. Hypotension, acute kidney injury, extended intensive care unit stay, and death were associated with CSE and GA, whereas CLSB demonstrated better hemodynamic stability, a better perioperative course, earlier ambulation, and better outcomes in high-risk elderly patients. Regional anesthesia, maintaining hemodynamic stability, is imperative in elderly hip surgery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Harde et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Hip fractures (n=126). Combined lumbosacral plexus block (CLSB) and General anesthesia (GA) vs. Combined spinal, epidural (CSE) was evaluated on Overall complications (p=0.001). Combined lumbosacral plexus block was associated with fewer overall complications (20%) compared to combined spinal-epidural (55%) and general anesthesia (30%) in elderly hip surgery (P=0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: