Review demonstrates the effectiveness of ultrasound-based treatments for rejuvenating the face and neck, suggesting noninvasive alternatives for skin laxity.
Aims and Backgrounds: To review the current state of ultrasound energy-based devices and their role in facial and neck rejuvenation Historical Aspects: High-frequency ultrasound (HIFU) paved the way for the microfocused and parallel beam ultrasound technology in aesthetics. Anatomy: Facial and cervical aging reflects multilayered structural changes, as well as reduced collagen production and increased collagen breakdown at the histologic level resulting in rhytids and skin laxity. Technology: Microfocused ultrasound with visualization (MFU-V) is adapted from HIFU, using significantly less ultrasound energy and visualization to precisely target the deep dermis and superficial musculoaponeurotic system (SMAS) at depths ranging from 1.5 to 4.5 mm; Synchronous Ultrasound Parallel Beam (SUPERB) technology uses parallel transducers to deliver energy at a precise depth of 1.5 mm to target the mid-dermis. Patient Selection: Ultrasonic facial rejuvenation is ideal for those with mild to moderate skin laxity who desire incremental tightening and textural improvement without surgery. Techniques: MFU-V can be performed at different tissue depths based on transducer tip with various combination protocols described; SUPERB technology delivers energy at a fixed depth Postoperative Care: Self-limited erythema and edema, sun protection Current and Future Development: The intersection of ultrasonic devices and regenerative medicine is promising. Conclusions and Clinical Relevance: MFU-V and SUPERB are ideal noninvasive options for patients with mild to moderate skin laxity.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liao et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: