PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026One Health Outlook0 citationsOpen Access

Innovating for One Health: federal perspectives and key lessons on building integrative programs for wildlife in Canada

AWAlana WilcoxCSCraig StephenJPJennifer F. Provencher

Key Points

  • This research aims to explore perceptions and mobilization of the One Health approach at the federal level in Canada, emphasizing wildlife health.
  • Conducted focus groups with staff at Environment and Climate Change Canada
  • Discussed themes such as program development, success metrics, and implementation limitations
  • Identified four key lessons for improving One Health programming
  • Emphasized the importance of a settings-based approach for inclusivity
  • Highlighting the need for a shared mandate to enhance impact
  • Identified the role of champions and leaders in driving innovation
  • Noted barriers to collaborative research that require addressing systemic limitations

Abstract

At a national level, Canada has committed to advancing the One Health approach, recognizing the interconnection between human, animal, and environment health. One Health, however, has often focused on zoonotic diseases and their impacts on human health, limiting the scope and integration of wildlife and environment health. There is also a growing recognition of the need to develop collaborative strategies to address gaps in research, reflecting diverse expertise and priorities. To explore how One Health is perceived and can be mobilized at the federal level, we conducted a series of focus groups with staff at Environment and Climate Change Canada, discussing themes including novel and innovative program development, metrics of success, and limitations to program development and implementation. Supported by the literature, we describe the four key lessons that emerged for strengthening One Health programming: (1) adopt a settings-based approach to foster inclusivity and optimize the health of people, animals, and the environment; (2) establish a shared goal and / or mandate for a team can create a shared purpose and enhance impact; (3) identify champions and leaders who can drive innovation; and (4) bring in key experts, but maintain flexibility to ensure skills are aligned with program needs. While examples highlight innovative program development and implementation, focus group participants emphasized barriers to collaborative and integrative research on human, animal, and environment health extending beyond federal science and that require institutions to address systemic limitations on research innovation. Nonetheless, to promote optimal health outcomes, including those for wildlife and the environment, professionals can adopt integrative and interdisciplinary approaches and drive a movement from knowledge to action.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Wilcox et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1ce605cdc762e9d857795https://doi.org/10.1186/s42522-026-00207-6
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Avian influenza viruses in wild birds in Canada following incursions of highly pathogenic H5N1 virus from Eurasia in 2021–20222024 · 60 citations
  2. 2Defining features of the practice of global health research: an examination of 14 global health research teams2010 · 30 citations
  3. 3Factors that enable effective One Health collaborations - A scoping review of the literature2019 · 105 citations
  4. 4A framework for conceptualizing leadership in conservation2021 · 18 citations
  5. 5Indigenous Peoples: Traditional knowledges, climate change, and health2023 · 105 citations