This review explores JAK/STAT signaling's role in liver disease, highlighting its potential as a therapeutic target with context-dependent effects.
Liver disease remains a major global health burden, and effective targeted therapies are still lacking for many conditions, particularly chronic inflammatory, fibrotic, and malignant liver diseases. The JAK/STAT signaling pathway has emerged as a central regulator of cytokine signaling in the liver and is increasingly considered a potential therapeutic target. However, its biological effects are highly context-dependent. In this review, we address a central question: is the JAK/STAT pathway a practical therapeutic target in liver disease, or does its context-dependent biology limit direct clinical translation? We summarize how JAK/STAT signaling regulates antiviral defense, immune tolerance, macrophage polarization, hepatic stellate cell activation, fibrogenesis, and tumor-promoting inflammation across viral hepatitis, autoimmune liver disease, NAFLD/NASH, liver fibrosis, cirrhosis, and hepatocellular carcinoma. Importantly, the evidence indicates that JAK/STAT signaling is not uniformly pathogenic. Its effects vary according to disease stage, upstream cytokine milieu, canonical versus non-canonical activation, and, critically, cell type-specific responses in hepatocytes, immune cells, hepatic stellate cells, and tumor-associated cells. This review examines the molecular mechanisms of this signaling pathway in various liver pathologies, summarizes the current research into regulating these signals as a potential treatment for chronic liver disease. Rather than broad pathway inhibition, future strategies should focus on cell-specific, disease-stage-specific, and function-selective modulation to suppress pathogenic inflammation and fibrosis while preserving antiviral immunity and tissue-repair programs. This framework may better support precision medicine approaches for chronic liver disease and liver cancer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: