Demonstrates the thermodynamic limits of regulated stability in complex systems, indicating critical survival mechanisms.
The General Theory of Regulated Stability (GTRS) posits that the persistence of complex systems is governed by the regulatory ratio ρ = R/σ, where R is regulatory capacity and σ is perturbation pressure. In the foundational architecture (SIP-CORE-03, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.19588952), the lower bound of sustainable existence — the infimum α — was postulated to satisfy 0 < α < 1. An external adversarial panel (HATI³ evaluation, April 2026) identified this postulation as the framework’s primary tautological vulnerability: α was defined as an infimum while its bounds were asserted without derivation. This paper replaces that postulate with a formal derivation grounded in non-equilibrium thermodynamics. By mapping σ to the rate of internal entropy production (Ṡ_int) and R to the rate of entropy export (Ṡ_ext), we define the net entropy change as dS/dt = σ(1 − ρ). We demonstrate that the strict lower bound (α > 0) is an obligate consequence of the Second Law of Thermodynamics: no system can survive the symmetric vacuum without active regulatory work. Furthermore, we prove that the upper bound (α < 1) emerges from the existence of a finite structural macrostate buffer (ΔS_crit). Because complex systems possess structural slack — the capacity to absorb entropy temporarily without global collapse — they can survive transient periods of decoherence (dS/dt > 0) provided recoherence occurs before the buffer is exhausted. The survival time during decoherence is τ_death = ΔS_crit / σ(1 − ρ), establishing a quantitative link between thermodynamic buffer depth and CDR dynamics. By deriving these bounds from physical law rather than asserting them from observation, this paper establishes GTRS not merely as a qualitative taxonomy but as a thermodynamically grounded theory of complex system survival. The multi-buffer nested hierarchy is introduced to explain the Captured Recoherence State (CRS) as a system operating on a secondary, shallower entropy buffer after exhaustion of its primary buffer.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Smith et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: