Explores how information sharing and traffic investment influence cooperation mode choice in e-commerce supply chains, highlighting implications for competitive brands.
Brand self-live streaming and influential streamer live streaming are two typical cooperation modes in the live streaming e-commerce supply chain. When an incumbent brand dominates the market, a competitive brand merchant that seeks to enter new markets through a live streaming e-commerce platform must carefully choose its cooperation mode. To address this challenge, this study develops a three-party Stackelberg game model involving a competitive brand merchant, an incumbent brand merchant, and a platform with an advantage in demand information. The model examines how information sharing and traffic investment affect cooperation mode selection. The results show that: (1) Traffic cost and commission rate are the core constraints of cooperation mode choice. Influential streamer live streaming dominates under low traffic cost, while brand self-live streaming provides stronger control under high commission rates. (2) Platform information sharing exhibits mode dependence. Under brand self-live streaming, the platform has a persistent incentive to share demand information. (3) Supply chain members achieve win–win outcomes under different conditions. At low (high) traffic cost, influential streamer live streaming (brand self-live streaming) is superior. (4) Overall supply chain efficiency varies across contexts. At moderate traffic cost, brand self-live streaming performs better, whereas low traffic cost with an appropriate commission rate favors influential streamer live streaming.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: