PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 2026Sustainability2 citationsOpen Access

Environmental Impacts of Municipal Solid Waste Disposal in Urban Areas: A Systematic Review of Contamination Pathways, Assessment Methods, and Mitigation Strategies

View Full Paper
ZPZhaksylyk PernebayevAAAkbota Aitimbetova

Key Points

  • This review examines the environmental impacts of municipal solid waste disposal, focusing on contamination in urban areas.
  • Conducted a systematic review following PRISMA 2020 guidelines.
  • Screened 286 peer-reviewed studies from multiple databases including PubMed and Dimensions.
  • Applied structured eligibility screening and quality appraisal using an adapted JBI checklist.
  • Heavy metals like lead and cadmium commonly exceeded WHO drinking water guidelines.
  • Soil contamination at dumpsites persisted for decades, with frequent documentation of toxic elements.
  • Particulate matter levels reached up to 41 times the WHO 2021 guideline in South Asia.

Abstract

Municipal solid waste disposed of in open dumpsites and unlined landfills contaminates groundwater, soils, and air across urban areas of low- and middle-income countries. Nevertheless, impacts across all three environmental media have not been systematically assessed together. We conducted a PRISMA 2020-compliant systematic review of 286 peer-reviewed studies from PubMed, Dimensions, and OpenAlex, applying structured eligibility screening and quality appraisal using an adapted JBI checklist. Heavy metals—lead, cadmium, chromium, and zinc—were the most frequently detected contaminants in leachate and groundwater, commonly exceeding WHO drinking water guidelines by one to three orders of magnitude. Soil contamination by potentially toxic elements was documented at virtually all open dumpsites studied, persisting for decades after site closure. Particulate matter at South Asian MSW sites reached up to 41 times the WHO 2021 annual guideline. Microplastics acting as heavy metal carriers and dumpsite leachate as a source of antimicrobial resistance genes were identified as emerging risks outside standard monitoring frameworks. Non-carcinogenic hazard indices exceeded acceptable thresholds in the majority of health risk studies reviewed. Engineered containment was the strongest predictor of contamination severity across all sites. Phytoremediation, constructed wetlands, and biofiltration showed promise as mitigation approaches. Critical evidence gaps remain for Central Asia, harmonized reporting standards, and longitudinal monitoring data.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Pernebayev et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cf985cdc762e9d858865https://doi.org/10.3390/su18083900
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper