PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 17, 20260 citationsOpen Access

Biosignatures of cognitive basic symptoms mark a distinct neurodevelopmental pathway to schizophrenia.

View Full Paper
NKNikolaos KoutsoulerisCVClara VetterMBMadalina BuciumanMax Planck Institute of Psychiatry

Key Points

  • This research aims to compare brain signatures across different clinical high-risk definitions to better understand their relationship with schizophrenia.
  • Applied machine learning to structural MRI data from 1,425 patients and 907 healthy controls.
  • Compared brain signatures of Cognitive Disturbances, Ultra-High-Risk, and Mixed groups.
  • Evaluated signatures for diagnostic separability and similarity to schizophrenia.
  • COGDIS signature effectively separated patients from controls with a 69% accuracy.
  • COGDIS and schizophrenia signatures shared significant overlap, indicating a neurodevelopmental link.
  • UHR and MIXED signatures exhibited weak diagnostic specificity and varied volume patterns, showing less alignment with schizophrenia.

Abstract

Efforts to predict schizophrenia risk using biological data have been hampered by the heterogeneity of current "clinical-high-risk" (CHR-P) criteria, which pool phenomenologically and biologically distinct syndromes under a single label. In particular, the field has focused almost exclusively on ultra-high-risk (UHR) symptoms, while cognitive basic symptoms (COGDIS)-despite their close alignment with schizophrenia's core features such as formal thought disorder-have remained underutilised. To date, no study has directly compared brain signatures of different CHR-P definitions with respect to their similarity to schizophrenia and their diagnostic, biopsychosocial, and prognostic profiles. We applied machine learning to structural MRI data from 1,425 patients (CHR-P subgroups, recent-onset psychosis, depression) and 907 healthy controls to derive and compare diagnostic brain signatures for Cognitive Disturbances (COGDIS), Ultra-High-Risk (UHR), their overlap (MIXED), and schizophrenia. The MIXED and UHR signatures lacked diagnostic separability and similarity with schizophrenia. Contrarily, the COGDIS signature distinguished patients from controls (BAC=69%, P < .001) and aligned with the schizophrenia signature (r = 0.60), involving shared fronto-parieto-perisylvian volume reductions. UHR was characterised by volume enlargements, whereas MIXED exhibited a mixed pattern of reductions and enlargements relative to healthy controls. COGDIS and schizophrenia signature expressions were predictable with 12%-21% variance explained based on polygenic, cognitive, and exposomal factors both in a transdiagnostic patient cohort and in healthy controls. Their expressions increased from health to schizophrenia. MIXED signature expression was also predictable from biopsychosocial data, but with higher explained variance in patient samples (21%) than in healthy controls (3%). UHR signature expression showed no significant biopsychosocial predictability in either group. Cell-enriched polygenic risk profiles differed across signatures, with COGDIS and schizophrenia showing enrichment patterns implicated in neurodevelopmental processes, while MIXED being associated with immune- and blood-brain-barrier-related enrichments. Longitudinally, COGDIS and schizophrenia brain scores stratified patients with functional disability, while UHR scores predicted better outcomes. Together, these findings indicate that psychosis-risk syndromes differ markedly in the diagnostic specificity, biopsychosocial informativeness and prognostic value of their underlying brain signatures. UHR symptoms are linked to a weak and diagnostically unspecific brain pattern, while the MIXED phenotype is characterised by a dimensional, transdiagnostic signature enriched across early psychotic and affective disease states. In contrast, COGDIS aligns with a neurodevelopmentally grounded vulnerability pattern that converges with schizophrenia's cognitive-disorganisation dimension. These distinctions support a biologically informed reconceptualization of psychosis risk, with cognitive basic symptoms capturing a core liability dimension of schizophrenia, while other risk states reflecting more transient processes underlying psychotic symptom expression.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Koutsouleris et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e1cfcb5cdc762e9d858c5bhttps://doi.org/10.48620/96968
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper