Benchmarks various computational methods for predicting stability in bromine-containing crystals, suggesting the need for internal validation.
Selecting appropriate computational methods for organic crystals becomes particularly challenging for systems containing heavy halogens like bromine, whose complex electronic structures and diverse non-covalent interactions challenge approximate methods. Here we benchmark periodic DFT (PBE-D3BJ), CrystalExplorer (CE17/CE21), DFTB3-D3BJ, and PM7 against experimental stability data for 14 chlorine- and bromine-containing polymorphs across six CSD families. Chlorine systems show method-consistent performance, but bromine introduces large lattice energy variations (>10 kJ/mol) and, in several cases, qualitatively wrong stability rankings. Crucially, low mean absolute errors do not ensure correct thermodynamic ordering, and no semi-empirical method proves universally reliable for bromine. Only PBE-D3BJ achieves perfect experimental agreement. These results position bromine-containing crystals as exceptionally sensitive benchmarks and emphasize internal validation against experiment or reference DFT as essential before large-scale studies—particularly timely as machine-learning potentials emerge.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Isupova et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: