A legal case influences the use of appropriateness criteria in radiology, suggesting careful implementation and review requirements.
The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria have historically served an advisory role in guiding image ordering and lacked legal import in establishing the standard of care. However, a 2025 Ohio appellate court case permitted use of the Appropriateness Criteria at trial, challenging their conventional status. Radiologists should exercise caution when implementing protocoling workflows that bypass independent radiologist review and remain diligent in contacting ordering practitioners regarding requests for inappropriate examination types.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jonathan L. Mezrich (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: