Prospective diagnostic-accuracy study evaluates AI tool in CT angiography, suggesting comparable accuracy to clinical reports.
The diagnostic accuracy of AIDOC-VO, the first commercial artificial intelligence tool for intracranial large-and medium-vessel occlusion (LVO/MeVO) detection on head-and-neck CT angiography (CTA), was evaluated in a multicenter emergency setting. A prospective diagnostic-accuracy study of 3,031 adult CT angiograms (mean age, 67.3 years ± 16.4 [SD]; 1,549 females) acquired March-July 2024 across a ten-hospital region was performed. The AI model was compared with clinical radiology reporting. Examinations flagged positive or doubt by either the AI model or report underwent blinded rereading for reference-standard establishment. Of 3,031 CT angiograms, valid AI model output was yielded for 2,804 (92.5%), of which 224/2,804 (8.0%) had vessel occlusion (VO) on referencestandard reading. For VO detection within intended use (218/224), sensitivity was 81.7% (178/218) (clinical report: 81.2% [177/218]; P =.91), and specificity was 99.6% (2,569/2,580) (clinical report: 99.3% [2,561/2,580]; P =.12). LVO sensitivity was 92.8% (64/69) (clinical report: 87.0% [60/69]; P =.42) and MeVO sensitivity was 76.1% (121/159) (clinical report: 79.2% [126/159]; P =.55). The AI model identified VOs missed by radiologists in 42 examinations, for an enhanced detection rate of 18.8% (42/224; 15 per 1,000 CT angiograms), and generated 11 false alerts (3.9 per 1,000 CT angiograms). Performance did not differ significantly from clinical radiology reporting.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Andersson et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: