Analyzing genome expansion linked to TE interactions and host silencing factors in Caelifera, suggesting evolutionary mechanisms at play.
Caelifera (Insecta: Orthoptera) exhibits remarkable genome size variation (0.97-21.48 Gb), primarily driven by massive expansions of transposable elements (TEs), which contribute to genomic gigantism. Although TE insertions can enhance genome plasticity, they are generally deleterious, leading to a continuous coevolutionary arms race with host silencing mechanisms. Here, we analyzed the genomes of ten Caelifera species (0.97-9.08 Gb) and found that significant genome expansion in Acridoidea coincides with multiple waves of TE bursts and a slow rate of TE loss. In species with gigantized genomes, we observed a rapid reduction in the number of C2H2-ZNF domains (KRAB-ZFPs host silencing factors) accompanied by shifts in amino acid preferences at TE-targeting positions. For the PIWI-clade evolution, small genomes were subjected to stronger purifying selection compared to gigantized genomes. Notably, in gigantized genomes, extensive TE insertions resulted in ultra-long introns (> 200 kb) in PIWI-clade genes, with significantly reduced transcript abundance, which may represent a mechanism for TE anti-silencing. Moreover, Ago3 mRNA elongation in gigantized genomes (primarily 3' UTR-expansion driven) coincides with reduced transcript abundance. Importantly, the ping-pong cycle results in a simultaneous increase in both retrotransposon transcript abundance and piRNA abundance during genome gigantism. However, the increased piRNA abundance may not be sufficient to silence a larger proportion of retrotransposons, leading to a lower retrotransposon silencing ratio and a higher number of active retrotransposons. These results advance our understanding of how TE-host silencing coevolution shapes genome expansion and maintains genomic stability in gigantized genomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Liu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: