This proof of concept examines optimal causal horizons affecting phase coherence in a hyperbolic system, indicating important interactions.
HyDRA-Physics: Emergent Structure and Optimal Causal Horizons in a Hyperbolic Dynamical System with Learned Interactions HyDRA-Physics is a geometric dynamical system in which 128 particle-like entities evolve on a Lorentz (hyperboloid) manifold under Lennard-Jones–type potentials, Kuramoto phase coupling, a learned neural interaction function, and a dynamic curvature field. The system is integrated via overdamped Langevin dynamics with manifold-constrained exponential-map updates in 16-dimensional hyperbolic space. Central Finding — Optimal Causal Horizon The main result is a non-monotonic dependence of global phase coherence Γ on the causal horizon radius R_H, which limits the geodesic interaction range of each particle. A coarse four-point ablation (R_H ∈ {1, 2, 3, ∞}) reveals that coherence peaks sharply at R_H = 2.0 (Γ = 0.273) and degrades for both smaller and larger horizons. A fine-grained 12-point sweep refines the optimum to R* ≈ 1.75, identifying a sharp phase-like transition between an under-connected regime (R_H ≤ 1.5, Γ < 0.09) and a coherent regime (R_H ≥ 1.75). This demonstrates the existence of an optimal causal interaction scale: neither maximal nor minimal connectivity produces the best collective behaviour. Supporting Results Hyperbolic geometry advantage: A Euclidean baseline confirms that hyperbolic geometry is essential — Γ_hyp = 0.220 vs. Γ_euc = 0.060, a 3.6× advantage under identical dynamics. Multi-seed reproducibility: Five independent random seeds yield Γ = 0.222 ± 0.058, confirming that emergent dynamics are not artefacts of initialisation. Robustness: The optimal horizon region R_H ∈ [1.5, 2.0] is consistent across five parameter perturbations (thermal noise, potential strength, attraction scale). Emergent curvature: The dynamic curvature field converges to κ̄ ≈ 1.08, an emergent value not prescribed but learned through density–distance feedback. Energy stability: Total energy remains stable across all experimental conditions, confirming numerical integrity of the integration scheme. System Components 1. Lorentz manifold embedding (H^16 ⊂ R^17)2. Lennard-Jones–type pairwise potential (σ_a = 1.8, σ_r = 0.6)3. Kuramoto phase synchronisation with distance-decaying coupling4. Learned neural interaction function f_ϕ(d_eff, |Δθ|, r_i, r_j)5. Dynamic curvature field κ(ρ) mapping local density to effective metric6. Soft causal horizon with sigmoid masking at radius R_H Important Caveats This system is a geometric dynamical substrate for emergent structure, not a simulator of any real physical system. All experiments use N = 128 particles — a small-scale proof of concept. No real-world data is involved. Statistical evaluation is based on 5 seeds; results constitute a proof of concept and do not imply generality beyond the tested configuration. License © 2026 Éric Gustavo Reis de Sena. Licensed under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0. Trained model weights (.pt files) and methodology/architecture are All Rights Reserved. Commercial use, AI training, and TDM for commercial purposes are prohibited without written permission (EU Directive 2019/790, Art. 4). See LICENSE.txt for full terms. Configuration: N=128, dim=16, T=2000, dt=0.05, seed=42. Framework: PyTorch (float64). All code and data included for full reproducibility.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
ÉRIC GUSTAVO REIS DE SENA (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: