PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología0 citationsOpen Access

Mechanical Response and Microstructural Evolution of Aluminium Alloy Matrix Reinforced with Pulverized Periwinkle Shell Particulates

SISunday IweriolorAAAfokhainu Segun AgbaduaNENgozi Grace Emordi

Key Points

  • The aim is to evaluate how pulverized periwinkle shell particles affect the mechanical and microstructural properties of aluminium alloys.
  • Conducted experimental hardness tests using Vickers microhardness technique.
  • Utilized scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) for analysis.
  • Assessed various percentages of PPS reinforcement (0% to 25%) in the aluminium alloy.
  • Hardness peaked at 157.9 HV with 20% PPS reinforcement, linked to optimal particle dispersion.
  • Hardness decreased with 10% and 15% PPS, attributed to weak bonding and agglomeration effects.
  • Higher loadings led to a decline in hardness due to particle clustering, particularly at 25%.
  • Grain refinement observed at 15% PPS, but coarser grains appeared at 20-25% reinforcement.

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of pulverized periwinkle shell (PPS) particles as reinforcement for aluminium alloy. Experimental hardness test and scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive spectroscopy (SEM-EDS) were used for the mechanical and microstructural analysis. Vickers microhardness testing showed a high degree of internal consistency between experimental and computed results. The experimental and computed hardness of the base alloy 144.5/143.HV was reduced to 134.4/133.6 HV at 10% reinforcement and at 15%, it was further reduced to 125.7/124.7 HV. This was attributed to weak bonding and partial agglomeration. A peak hardness of 157.9/158.3 HV was achieved at 20% PPS, corresponding to the smallest mean indentation diagonal (0.0108 mm) and was attributed to optimal particle dispersion and stress transfer. At 25% PPS, hardness declined slightly (148.3/147.7 HV) due to clustering effects. The unreinforced alloy (0% PPS) was determined to be dendritic and compositionally homogenous (100 at. % Al). Elemental variety was introduced with the addition of PPS. At 25% reinforcement, up to five elements were found. 15% PPS showed grain refinement (~45–50 µm), but higher loadings (20–25 wt.%) resulted in localized particle aggregation and coarser grains (~60–70 µm).The findings show that the microstructure and mechanical behaviour of aluminium alloy were modified by PPS reinforcement. At 15–20 wt.% PPS, elemental distribution, microstructural refinement, and hardness were all effectively aligned, resulting in optimal performance and establishing PPS as an efficient and sustainable reinforcement for aluminium composites.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Iweriolor et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31ec840886becb653e744https://doi.org/10.53982/ajerd.2026.0901.19-j
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Predictive Modeling of Thermo-Mechanical Performance of Bio-reinforced Intumescent Epoxy Coatings for Industrial Sustainability2025 · 1 citations
  2. 2Aluminium matrix composites: Challenges and opportunities2003 · 1,230 citations
  3. 3Intelligent modeling of carbonized wood-silicon dioxide filled natural rubber composite for outer shoe sole manufacturing2023 · 6 citations
  4. 4Comparative Performance Evaluation of Conventional and Renewable Thermal Insulation Materials Used in Building Envelops2020 · 50 citations
  5. 5Mollusk Shell Formation: A Source of New Concepts for Understanding Biomineralization Processes2005 · 1,071 citations