PulseExploreJournal ClubDebatesTrendingResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeExploreJournal ClubTrending
Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
April 18, 2026Franklin Open1 citationsOpen Access

A Comprehensive Review and Comparative Analysis of Bridgeless Power Factor Correction Converter Topologies for Electric Vehicle Charging Applications

View Full Paper
MVM. VishvanathITPEnergised Group (India)AVA. VenkadesanITPEnergised Group (India)

Key Points

  • This review aims to assess various bridgeless power factor correction converter topologies for electric vehicle charging.
  • Conducted a systematic review of bridgeless PFC converter topologies.
  • Compared converters using performance indicators like voltage gain, power factor, and THD.
  • Utilized analytical insights and MATLAB/Simulink evaluations for comparative analysis.
  • The BL Zeta and BL Luo converters showed superior performance in power quality.
  • Reduced device stress and balanced component requirements were observed in top-performing designs.
  • Identified key design challenges for future improvements in EV charging systems.

Abstract

The rapid adoption of battery electric vehicles (BEVs) has significantly increased the demand for high-efficiency and reliable AC–DC converters in both onboard and offboard charging systems. Bridgeless (BL) power factor correction (PFC) converters have emerged as attractive alternatives to conventional diode-bridge-based front-end architectures due to their reduced conduction losses and improved input current quality. This review presents a systematic and comparative assessment of widely reported BL-PFC converter topologies, including the BL Buck–Boost, BL Cuk, BL SEPIC, BL Zeta, and BL Luo converters. The comparison is conducted using key performance indicators, including voltage gain characteristics, input power factor, total harmonic distortion (THD), semiconductor voltage and current stress, and component count. Analytical insights, complemented by MATLAB/Simulink-based comparative evaluations, are employed to elucidate the inherent trade-offs among the different configurations. The review highlights that, consistent with trends reported in the literature, the BL Zeta and BL Luo converters exhibit superior overall performance in terms of power quality, reduced device stress, and balanced component requirements. In addition, this work consolidates existing knowledge, identifies key design challenges, and outlines future research directions aimed at reducing circuit complexity, improving reliability, and enabling high-performance, compact, and cost-effective EV charging systems.

Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Cite This Study

Vishvanath et al. (2026) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/69e31f1a40886becb653e895https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fraope.2026.100599
Ask AI
Helpful
Bookmark
Share
View Full Paper

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1A Novel Bridgeless Cuk PFC Converter With Further Reduced Conduction Losses and Simple Circuit Structure2020 · 72 citations
  2. 2An Improved Variable On-Time Control Strategy for a CRM Flyback PFC Converter2016 · 70 citations
  3. 3Modified single‐switch bridgeless PFC SEPIC structure by eliminating circulating current and power quality improvement2019 · 18 citations
  4. 4A Soft-Switching Bridgeless AC–DC Power Factor Correction Converter2016 · 68 citations
  5. 5An Adjustable-Speed PFC Bridgeless Buck–Boost Converter-Fed BLDC Motor Drive2013 · 213 citations